Which of the following is an effect of restraint when used appropriately?

When restraints are used appropriately, one significant effect is the reduction in the risk of self-harm. This means that if an individual is at risk of harming themselves due to confusion, agitation, or other behavioral issues, restraints can be employed as a protective measure. The goal of using restraints in these scenarios is to ensure the safety of the individual, preventing them from engaging in actions that could lead to injury.

Restraints should always be used as a last resort and only after other less restrictive measures have been attempted. The intent is not to hinder a person's movement unnecessarily, but rather to provide a safe environment in situations where there is a genuine risk to their well-being. In the context of patient care, this reflects a commitment to protecting individuals while also considering their dignity and rights.

The other options illustrate varying impacts of restraints. Increased patient movement would be counterproductive when restraints are applied, as their purpose is to limit movement to prevent harm. Complete independence is generally not achievable while restraints are in place, since the use of restraints inherently restricts a person’s freedom to move independently. Lastly, increased patient frustration can happen if restraints are improperly used, but when used appropriately with the patient’s safety in mind, this is not the intended outcome.